📰The AI Briefing
This week's brief is that the major AI labs stopped competing on answers and started competing on actions. Every one of them shipped a way for the model to do the thing, not just describe it.
Google's Universal Cart turns AI from a recommender into a buyer. At I/O on May 19, Google unveiled Universal Cart, an AI-powered shopping experience working across Search, Gemini, YouTube, Gmail, and participating merchants. It is paired with an Agent Payments Protocol that lets an agent buy within user-set guardrails: brands, products, spending cap. If your product appears in Universal Cart, that is the new top of funnel. If it doesn't, that is the new bottom.
ChatGPT moves into your bank account. OpenAI previewed a personal finance experience for Pro users in the US, letting people connect accounts via Plaid, see a dashboard of spending, bills and net worth, and ask questions grounded in their financial context. It cannot move money yet. ChatGPT is becoming a place users go to make decisions. For marketers in finance, insurance, or any considered purchase, the conversation about your product is now happening one tab over from the customer's bank balance.
Anthropic ships Claude for Small Business. On May 13, Anthropic launched Claude for Small Business with 15 prebuilt agentic workflows and connectors to QuickBooks, PayPal, HubSpot, Canva, Docusign, Google Workspace, and Microsoft 365. A day later it announced a PwC partnership rolling out Claude Code and Cowork to a global workforce of hundreds of thousands. Two ends of the market, same week. The bet: small business owners would rather talk to Claude than navigate QuickBooks.
Grok ships Skills and a coding CLI. xAI launched Grok Skills on May 18, with persistent expertise plus document, deck and spreadsheet generation, four days after Grok Build, a coding agent CLI competing directly with Claude Code. The labs are converging on the same shape: agents that produce deliverables, not answers.
Sources: Google · OpenAI · Anthropic · xAI · Search Engine Journal
✍Andy’s Take
How I Rebuilt My Website Using Claude Code And Claude Design. And Why You Should Also.
I rebuilt goodvibemarketer.com from scratch this month, off Webflow. I used Claude Code for the build and Claude Design for the look. I soft launched it this week.
I am not an engineer. I am not a designer. I am a marketer with twenty years in CRM, automation, and content systems. The kind of marketer who has always been comfortable around tools but always called in specialists when the work crossed the line.
That line moved.
It moved further than most marketers have noticed yet, and the gap between marketers who notice and marketers who don’t is going to be the most expensive gap in our industry over the next twelve months.
This article is how I did it, and why you should be doing the same with at least one project of your own this quarter.
Why Claude Code And Claude Design Matters
Claude Design has been collecting headlines for a reason. It is the first AI design tool that produces output a marketer can actually ship without having a designer rework it.
Pair that with Claude Code, which writes the underlying website, and you have something genuinely new. A marketer can describe what they want, see it designed, see it built, and see it live, in one continuous workflow. No handoffs. No agency. No development queue.
That used to be three teams.
This month it was me, in a browser tab, in evenings, with a clear brief and a willingness to keep iterating until it looked right.
I am not telling you it was effortless. I will get to the messy bits in a moment. I am telling you the configuration that produced this site did not exist eighteen months ago. The fact that it exists now, and that it works for a marketer working alone, is the part you should be paying attention to.
How I Actually Used Claude Design
The mistake most people make with an AI design tool is treating it like a magic wand. You type “make me a beautiful website” and judge whatever it returns. The output is generic because the brief was.
Claude Design rewards the opposite. The more structure you give it, the better it gets.
I started by writing a design.md file. A few pages of plain text covering the things a designer would normally hold in their head. Typography. Colour palette. Spacing logic. Component patterns. A note on tone. I borrowed structural ideas from public design systems I admire, including Cursor’s, because I wanted my site to carry the same considered feel that AI-native companies tend to ship with.
That file became the seed. When I fed it to Claude Design, the output stopped being generic. It was opinionated, restrained where I had asked for restraint, confident where I had asked for confidence. Recognisably mine.
Claude Design is not a designer. It is a renderer. The brief is the design. The tool turns the brief into pixels.
The marketers who get the most out of these tools in the next year will be the ones who learn to write briefs that hold up to that kind of execution. Not the ones who type the most prompts.
🤝Partnership Promotion
Your prompts are leaving out 80% of what you're thinking.
When you type a prompt, you summarize. When you speak one, you explain. Wispr Flow captures your full reasoning — constraints, edge cases, examples, tone — and turns it into clean, structured text you paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or any AI tool. The difference shows up immediately. More context in, fewer follow-ups out.
89% of messages sent with zero edits. Used by teams at OpenAI, Vercel, and Clay. Try Wispr Flow free — works on Mac, Windows, and iPhone.




